Also available in: Italian, Spanish, French, German, Dutch

Fuel is one of the largest running costs of any vehicle fleet, and one of the hardest to control. The bill arrives once a month, after the waste has already happened, and a fleet-wide average hides the vehicles and habits that cause most of it.
GPS tracking does not save fuel by itself. What it does is show where fuel is being wasted, with evidence, so you can act on it. This guide covers the five fuel leaks that almost every fleet has, the data that exposes each one, how to measure your own baseline and a simple 30-day plan to reduce fleet fuel costs.
Why fuel is hard to control without data
Without tracking data, fuel spend is a single number at the end of the month. You cannot see how long vehicles idle, how fast they are driven, whether routes match the plan or whether a vehicle moves outside working hours. Three things make it worse:
- Averages hide outliers. Two or three vehicles, drivers or routes usually account for a disproportionate share of the waste.
- Invoices arrive late. Fuel-card statements show what was bought, not why consumption was high.
- There are no shared facts. A conversation with a driver about fuel quickly becomes opinion against opinion.
Tracking data supplies the missing facts: where each vehicle was, how long it stood still with the engine running, how fast it travelled and how many kilometres it covered.
The five fuel leaks in every fleet
1. Idling
A vehicle that is running but not moving still burns fuel. The US Department of Energy reports that idling a heavy-duty truck uses roughly 0.8 gallons (about 3 litres) of fuel per hour, with a range of about 0.6 to 1.5 gallons (roughly 2.3 to 5.7 litres) depending on the engine and load (source: Alternative Fuels Data Center). Vans and cars burn less, but the waste adds up over hundreds of stops.
What to look at: the live vehicle status shows whether each vehicle is moving, idle, stopped or offline. GPS history lists the stops and their duration for any day. In reports, compare engine hours with kilometres: a vehicle with many engine hours and few kilometres is spending its time running in place.
2. Speed and driving style
Speed and harsh driving have a direct effect on consumption. According to fueleconomy.gov, aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration and heavy braking) can lower fuel economy by roughly 15% to 30% at highway speeds and 10% to 40% in stop-and-go traffic, and fuel economy usually drops quickly above about 50 mph (80 km/h). Keep in mind that this compares calm and aggressive driving of the same vehicle. Across a whole fleet the effect is smaller, because most drivers are not at the extreme.
What to look at: route playback in GPS history uses speed-based colour coding, so you can see where and when vehicles run fast. Look for repeated patterns on the same road or with the same driver rather than single events.
3. Detours and inefficient routes
Every unnecessary kilometre is paid for in fuel, tyres and time. Compare the route a vehicle actually took with the planned one, check how many kilometres each trip covers and look for repeated detours. Geofences around depots and customer sites make arrivals and departures visible automatically, so you can see how long each stop really takes.
4. Unauthorised and private use
Weekend, night and out-of-area trips use fuel that the business pays for. Trip history shows when and where vehicles moved outside working hours. Pair it with driver management: when each vehicle is assigned to a driver, for example with an iButton ID, questions about a trip have a clear answer. Put the rules in writing first: what is allowed, what is not and what is tracked (see the privacy note below).
5. Vehicle condition
Overdue service, worn or under-inflated tyres and neglected filters all raise consumption, and they are easy to miss. Maintenance scheduling by date, distance or engine hours keeps service on time, and it gives you a history that explains a sudden change in consumption. Where your device and vehicle support it, CAN bus telematics can add fuel level and engine data to the picture.
| Fuel leak | Signal in the data | First action |
|---|---|---|
| Idling | Many long stops with the engine on, high engine hours per 100 km | Agree an idle limit and share the longest stops with drivers |
| Speed and driving style | Speed hot spots in route playback, repeat patterns per driver | Coach the drivers involved and review the road |
| Detours | More kilometres than planned, repeated off-route stops | Correct the route or the dispatch process |
| Unauthorised use | Movement outside working hours | Written use policy and driver assignment |
| Vehicle condition | Consumption rising after overdue service | Fix service dates and check tyres |
How to measure fuel performance
You cannot improve what you cannot compare. Start with a small set of numbers per vehicle, calculated over the same period:
- Litres per 100 km (or kilometres per litre). Combine fuel purchases (receipts, fuel cards or tank-level data) with the kilometres from GPS.
- Engine hours per 100 km. A quick indicator of idling that needs no fuel data.
- Stops and their duration. Total and average stop time with the engine running.
- Kilometres per trip against plan. Reveals detours and poor routing.
- Kilometres outside working hours. Reveals private or unauthorised use.
Compare vehicles of the same type doing similar work. A refrigerated van and a small car will never share the same benchmark.
GPS gives you distance, time, stops and speed. Actual fuel consumed comes from fuel receipts, fuel cards or fuel-level data from the vehicle, where available. Use both, and export the figures to PDF or Excel when you need to share them.
A worked example
The numbers below are illustrative, not a promise. Take 10 heavy trucks that each idle for one avoidable hour per working day. At roughly 3 litres per hour and 250 working days a year, that is 10 × 1 × 3 × 250 = 7,500 litres of fuel a year. If the fleet halves that idling, it saves about 3,750 litres. Multiply by your price per litre to see the money, then add the lower engine wear and fewer emissions.
Run the same calculation with your own vehicles and your own idle time from the tracking data. It turns a vague "we should idle less" into a number you can track.
What GPS tracking can and cannot do
- It shows where, when and for how long. That makes problems visible and conversations factual.
- It does not save fuel by itself. Savings come from the actions you take after seeing the data.
- It does not replace fuel-card controls. To catch fuel theft or card misuse you still need to check purchases against vehicle data.
- It does not read the tank on every vehicle. Fuel level needs a compatible sensor or CAN bus data.
Be careful with headline figures. Many vendors quote savings of 15% to 25% or more, but those are best cases that depend on how wasteful the fleet was to begin with. Measure your own baseline and judge your own results.
A 30-day plan to reduce fuel costs
- Days 1 to 7: set the baseline. Collect the key numbers above for every vehicle: kilometres, fuel, engine hours, stops and out-of-hours use.
- Days 8 to 14: share and agree rules. Show drivers the data, explain the goal and agree simple rules, such as an idle limit where it is safe and legal to switch the engine off.
- Days 15 to 21: fix the biggest leaks. Pick the three vehicles, drivers or routes with the largest gap and act on them: coaching, a new route, an overdue service.
- Days 22 to 30: compare and repeat. Recalculate the same numbers, compare them with the baseline and set the next target. Then review monthly.
Bring your drivers on board
Fuel data works best when drivers see it as help, not punishment. Explain what is tracked and why before you start, share results openly, recognise improvement and use outliers for coaching, not blame.
Remember the privacy basics: have a documented purpose, inform drivers, collect only what you need, limit access to location data and avoid continuous tracking of drivers outside working hours. Data protection rules differ by country, so check the details with your data protection adviser. Our guide to fleet management software has the wider privacy checklist.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Looking only at total litres instead of litres per 100 km for comparable vehicles.
- Tracking without giving feedback, so nothing changes.
- Punishing instead of coaching, which pushes drivers to resist the data.
- Ignoring maintenance when consumption rises.
- Comparing vehicles that do different jobs.
- Expecting results in one week. Habits and routes change over a few months.
Next steps
Start with one month of baseline data and the five numbers above. Once you can see where the fuel goes, the fixes are usually simple and cheap: a shorter idle limit, a better route, a service done on time.
Want to see how this works on your own vehicles? Request a demo, read how fleet operators use the platform or browse all platform features.
Frequently asked questions
How much fuel can GPS tracking save?
It depends on how much is wasted today. Savings come from less idling, calmer driving, shorter routes, less unauthorised use and better maintenance. Measure a baseline first and treat headline figures of 15% to 25% as best cases.
Does GPS tracking measure fuel consumption directly?
GPS gives distance, time, stops and speed. Actual fuel consumed comes from fuel receipts, fuel cards or fuel-level data from the vehicle, where the device and vehicle support it. Combining both gives litres per 100 km.
How much fuel does idling use?
According to the US Department of Energy, idling a heavy-duty truck uses roughly 0.8 gallons, about 3 litres, per hour. Vans and cars use less, but avoidable idling still adds up over many stops.
What is a good idle time limit?
There is no universal figure. Many fleets agree to switch the engine off when a vehicle will be stopped for more than a few minutes, where it is safe and legal. Set the limit by vehicle type and climate, then review it with your data.
How do I introduce fuel monitoring to drivers?
Tell them before tracking starts, explain what is collected and why, share results openly and use the data for coaching. Fuel monitoring works best when drivers see it as a way to make their work easier, not as punishment.
